Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Second Department, New York.
Giacoma MICELI, Appellant,
v.
Arthur REILLY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
April 18, 1977.
Tilles & Bronchick, Melville (C. Evans Tilles, Melville, of counsel), for
appellant.
Dreyer & Traub, New York City (Samuel Kirschenbaum and Brian Michael Seltzer,
New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
*588 In an action Inter alia to recover possession of real property, plaintiff
appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 7,
1977, which denied her motion for partial summary judgment. Order affirmed,
with $50 costs and disbursements. The Justice presiding at Special Term
properly refused to entertain this motion. At the time this motion was made, a
motion by plaintiff-appellant for similar relief was pending before another
Justice at Special Term. At the time this motion was decided, the appeal from
the order denying the prior motion was pending before this court. We note with
disapproval the fact that this is the fourth appeal taken by plaintiff to this
court from adverse decisions at Special Term (see Miceli v. Riley, 51 A.D.2d
972, 380 N.Y.S.2d 706; Miceli v. Reily, 54 A,.d.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 707;
Miceli v. Reilly, 56 A.D.2d 839, 392 N.Y.S.2d 377 (2d Dept., dec. March 7,
1977)). Two of these appeals raised issues which were virtually identical to
the issues raised in the other two. We strongly advise plaintiff to proceed
with the trial, which we have found to be necessary in this action (see Miceli
v. Reilly, 56 A.D.2d 839, 392 N.Y.S.2d 377 (2d Dept., dec. March 7, 1977),
Supra).
COHALAN, Acting P.J., and HAWKINS, SUOZZI and MOLLEN, JJ., concur.
393 N.Y.S.2d 557 (Mem), 57 A.D.2d 588
END OF DOCUMENT
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.Giacoma MICELI, Appellant,v.Arthur REILLY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
April 18, 1977.
Tilles & Bronchick, Melville (C. Evans Tilles, Melville, of counsel), for appellant.
Dreyer & Traub, New York City (Samuel Kirschenbaum and Brian Michael Seltzer, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
*588 In an action Inter alia to recover possession of real property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 7, 1977, which denied her motion for partial summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The Justice presiding at Special Term properly refused to entertain this motion. At the time this motion was made, a motion by plaintiff-appellant for similar relief was pending before another Justice at Special Term. At the time this motion was decided, the appeal from the order denying the prior motion was pending before this court. We note with disapproval the fact that this is the fourth appeal taken by plaintiff to this court from adverse decisions at Special Term (see Miceli v. Riley, 51 A.D.2d 972, 380 N.Y.S.2d 706; Miceli v. Reily, 54 A,.d.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 707; Miceli v. Reilly, 56 A.D.2d 839, 392 N.Y.S.2d 377 (2d Dept., dec. March 7, 1977)). Two of these appeals raised issues which were virtually identical to the issues raised in the other two. We strongly advise plaintiff to proceed with the trial, which we have found to be necessary in this action (see Miceli v. Reilly, 56 A.D.2d 839, 392 N.Y.S.2d 377 (2d Dept., dec. March 7, 1977), Supra).
COHALAN, Acting P.J., and HAWKINS, SUOZZI and MOLLEN, JJ., concur.
393 N.Y.S.2d 557 (Mem), 57 A.D.2d 588
END OF DOCUMENT