*********************
HOW LENDERS VIEW THE RMR BUSINESS MODEL - ACQUISITION COST FACTOR / FINANCING  
*********************
       Use to be that when you were ready to sell your alarm business that meant selling your subscriber contracts, your RMR; recurring monthly revenue under contract, to another alarm company owner.  Both the seller and the buyer spoke the same language, understood the business, what and how it worked, the customer base, type of alarm and alarm services, equipment and other issues pertinent to the operation of the seller's business.  Today plenty of alarm company owners are selling to other alarm company owners, but more and more deals are being picked up or financed by bankers, lenders and hedge funds.  What language do they speak?  I read an article, copied below with the kind consent of the author, that inspired this article today.  These finance based "buyers" are certainly an option because they generally are prepared to pay more for the RMR, but be prepared to pay more in legal and accounting fees to close the deal, because these deals are not "traditional alarm deals" in any sense.  Here's the article.

*********************
                “FROM A LENDER’S PERSPECTIVE”
One in a series of occasional articles written to help companies improve their ability to raise efficient capital and to improve the business relationship with their lender.

                    Change in SaaS / “as-a-service” metrics as a business evolves
                                      By:  David Stang
                                       August 2016
        I recently wrote about the importance of calculating the “CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) Ratio” for recurring revenue businesses (http://www.stangcapital.com/#!blog/tzc9v).  I stated that while the CAC Ratio is a robust unit metric calculation and takes into account most of a recurring revenue company’s key metrics, it is not as relevant in isolation.  
However, this ratio does become very useful as it is tracked over time and as it is calculated for potential future changes in the business.  As an example, let’s take a look at what happens to a typical residential security alarm company’s CAC Ratio as changes to the business are implemented.
   Base Case Assumptions:
       Base Case
Customer Acquisition Costs    $1,200
Creation Cost Multiple    30.0
ARPU / RMR per customer    $40
Gross Margin     80.0%
Attrition – annual    11.0%
Average Life of customer - in years    9.1
# of months to recoup Customer Acquisition Costs    37.5
     
Lifetime Value (not present valued)    $3,491
LTV/CAC figure = CAC Ratio    2.91
     
Lifetime Value (present valued at 8%)    $1,799
LTV (present valued) / CAC figure = CAC Ratio    1.50

       A big focus today for security alarm and other recurring revenue companies is to offer more products and/or services to customers in order to increase ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) or RMR (Recurring Monthly Revenue) per user.  Let’s say a company is successful in increasing its monthly ARPU from $40 to $50 with other key metrics (gross margin, creation cost multiple and attrition rate) remaining constant.  As can be seen in the table below; this does result in greater revenue over the approximately nine year life of a typical customer, but the CAC Ratio remains the same.
    Base Case    Incr ARPU    Change
Customer Acquisition Costs    $1,200    $1,500    $300
Creation Cost Multiple    30.0    30.0    --
ARPU / RMR per customer    $40    $50    $10
Gross Margin     80.0%    80.0%    --
Attrition – annual    11.0%    11.0%    --
Average Life of customer - in years    9.1    9.1    --
# of months to recoup Customer Acquisition Costs    37.5    37.5    --
             
Lifetime Value (not present valued)    $3,491    $4,364    $873
LTV/CAC figure = CAC Ratio    2.91    2.91    --
             
Lifetime Value (present valued at 8%)    $1,799    $2,248    $450
LTV (present valued) / CAC figure = CAC Ratio    1.50    1.50    --

     However, as I believe is more typically the case,  additional products and/or services are usually offered at lower margins that the core product offering.  As seen below; while a few more dollars are generated compared to our base case customer, the CAC Ratio declines, reflecting arguably a less valuable customer. 
    Base Case    Incr ARPU  & Decr GM    Change
Customer Acquisition Costs    $1,200    $1,500    $300
Creation Cost Multiple    30.0    30.0    --
ARPU / RMR per customer    $40    $50    $10
Gross Margin     80.0%    70.0%    -10.0%
Attrition – annual    11.0%    11.0%    --
Average Life of customer - in years    9.1    9.1    --
# of months to recoup Customer Acquisition Costs    37.5    42.9    5.4
             
Lifetime Value (not present valued)    $3,491    $3,818    $327
LTV/CAC figure = CAC Ratio    2.91    2.55    -0.36
             
Lifetime Value (present valued at 8%)    $1,799    $1,967    $169
LTV (present valued) / CAC figure = CAC Ratio    1.50    1.31    -0.19

    Ideally, additional products and/or services can be sold to increase ARPU, maintain margins and actually decrease attrition.  This is reportedly happening as smart home products have become lifestyle services as more and more people control their smart home via smart phone apps.  As shown in the table below; this scenario results in the desired double positive of increased revenue from customers and a resulting higher CAC ratio, evidencing this more valuable customer.

    Base Case    Incr ARPU & Decr Attrition    Change
Customer Acquisition Costs    $1,200    $1,500    $300
Creation Cost Multiple    30.0    30.0    --
ARPU / RMR per customer    $40    $50    $10
Gross Margin     80.0%    80.0%    --
Attrition – annual    11.0%    10.0%    -1.0%
Average Life of customer - in years    9.1    10.0    0.9
# of months to recoup Customer Acquisition Costs    37.5    37.5    --
             
Lifetime Value (not present valued)    $3,491    $4,800    $1,309
LTV/CAC figure = CAC Ratio    2.91    3.20    0.29
             
Lifetime Value (present valued at 8%)    $1,799    $2,400    $601
LTV (present valued) / CAC figure = CAC Ratio    1.50    1.60    0.10

    CONCLUSION
     The calculation of the CAC Ratio is important for all recurring revenue businesses, not just pure SaaS companies.  This ratio demonstrates if changes to a company’s key unit metrics result in a more or less desirable customer base.  Further, as recurring revenue businesses strive to increase their ARPU, they need to be careful to ensure that margins are maintained and creation costs incurred to generate this additional ARPU are controlled.  Finally, the holy grail of a more valuable customer base from increased ARPU and lower attrition (“stickier” customers) is evidenced in a greater CAC Ratio.

David Stang is the Founder and President of Stang Capital Advisory LLC, a firm that assists companies in raising new and incremental capital and improves the relationship between companies and their financing partners.  He has over 25 years of banking experience and ran Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Security Industry lending group for 10 years.  He can be reached at dstang@stangcapital.com or 312-515-9249.
**********************